Valuing Time Differently
I've always loved reading; I still do. Now that Piper is a little older, some days I find a little time to read. (No, I don't find any time to cook, clean or do laundry - it's all about priorities, people!) However, these days I feel particular impatience with some authors. The reason is that I feel I have so little time alone that every book I read must be worthy of my attention.
For example, a couple of weeks ago I read a book by Maureen Dowd called "Are men necessary?" Dowd is a New York Times columnist, and her columns are witty and sharp. Therefore, I expected a witty and substantive discourse on feminism. The book turned out to be a sloppy compilations of Dowd's rantings. For example, she cites scientific research for the proposition that in 100,000 years the Y chromosome will be extinct. It's pretty obvious that she sat down one afternoon and slapped the book together.
Before Piper was born, I did not feel the same scorn for unworthy literature. I might discard a book, but I'd move on and wouldn't take it as a personal affront. Now, my feeling is, I have so little time, and I'm reading this garbage? Oy.

4 Comments:
As usual, I can relate to the post. I also find myself even less patient during meetings than I used to be. Also, much more indignant at dangerous drivers, especially if my son's in the car with me.
Me too. Totally!
But it also makes good books an even better treat. (Thanks, Jess, for recommending "The Master and Margarita"; it was interesting and worth the time!)
Am I the only one who hated Master and Margarita?
Oops. I didn't mean to be anonymous in my post.
I don't know, Marianna. I REALLY liked it. (although I concede it is quite strange)
Post a Comment
<< Home